Paul Tully, general secretary of the Society for the Protection of
Unborn Children said: "Implementation of the Donaldson report will mean
the creation of carbon copy embryos who will be denied the right to
live. The recommendations fly in the face of two votes in the European
Parliament against human cloning.
"Cell nuclear replacement involves so-called somatic cells, but
the report does not recommend that consent should be required for the
use of such cells. The report says that consent should be obtained from
those whose sperm and eggs are used to create embryos through cell
nuclear replacement, yet this technique does not involve sperm. It is a
nonsense.
"The report misrepresents the law on human embryos. It claims
that the 1990 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act does not
distinguish between embryos created from eggs and sperm and those
created by cell nuclear replacement. However, embryos are defined on
the first page of the act as resulting from fertilisation.
"We oppose the manufacture and destruction of cloned embryos,
but alternative stem cell research is being pursued using adult cells.
This holds out hope for those with incurable conditions. Killing
embryos is not the only way to help, and it is heartless and
manipulative to tell patients there is no alternative.
"The committee seems to want Britain to catch up with other
countries in human spare part research, yet it seeks to permit
unethical practices which our European and American competitors have
avoided. The Charter of Fundamental Rights may contain an explicit and
binding prohibition of cloning.
"If the research envisaged in this report goes ahead, it will bring the birth of cloned babies much closer," concluded Mr Tully.
Paul Tully, general secretary of SPUC, said: "The government has
sent an unambiguous signal to its MPs by aligning itself closely with a
coterie of pro-cloning scientists. No one will be taken in by the
protestations of a free vote for Labour members when the report and the
government announcement have been so closely coordinated. Previous
so-called free votes on human life issues have been tainted by
suggestions of pressure on MPs."
He added: "We call upon the government to withdraw its response
to the report to allow a truly open debate in the lead-up to the free
vote in parliament that it has promised."
SPUC welcomed the rejection of the report by Dr Liam Fox MP,
shadow health secretary, as well as his endorsement of adult stem cell
research. Paul Tully said: "We are heartened by his strong statement
and we encourage other MPs to follow his lead".
Dr Fox stated earlier today that the use of embryos in human
cloning was "morally and ethically unacceptable" and that he would vote
against it on principle. He said: "For those of us who never accepted
the moral legitimacy of the current legislation [on embryology], it is
merely the extension of an already unacceptable position."
Mr Tully said: "Parliament should not be bounced into breaking
ranks with the rest of the world. Embryo research for cloning humans is
unethical research for unethical ends."
In May, SPUC and other pro-life groups launched a nationwide petition calling on the Government to outlaw all human cloning, which will be presented to the House of Commons after it resumes sitting in the autumn. SPUC is encouraging members of the public to lobby MPs on the issue.