By continuing to browse our site, you are consenting to the use of cookies. Click here for more information on the cookies we use.

Hide

Defending life
from conception to natural death

FacebookTwitterInstagramYouTube
Join

Doctors must refer women for abortions - Irish PM

12 June 2018

 
Leo Varadkar and Simon Harris both showed contempt for conscience rights

But will he have to compromise?

Irish Taoiseach Leo Varadkar has insisted that doctors will be forced to refer women for abortions when legislation is introduced following the repeal of the Eighth Amendment. 

The remarks came after the National Association of GPs (NAGP) passed a motion that the body should "advocate for conscientious objection, without obligation to refer". Motions were also passed to call on the Health minister to ensure an "opt-in" provision for doctors who wish to provide abortion, and for him to confirm that he does not intend to "make a termination of pregnancy service part of routine general practice."

"Flies in the face of care and compassion"

Mr Varadkar hit back, saying: "No GP will be required to provide the service so we are very happy to accept the principle that it will be opt-in and, indeed, the legislation will provide for GPs to have a conscientious objection.

"But what we can’t allow is this suggestion that a GP who does not provide the service will then refuse to refer their patient on to somebody who would. Because essentially that is the equivalent of ‘you’re on your own, love’ and we are not going to have that."

Health Minister Simon Harris also criticised the GPs' stance, saying: “The idea of a woman in crisis sitting in front of her doctor & her doctor refusing to refer flies in face of care & compassion & is not reflective of doctors I know. People spoke & want women to be cared for. Conscientious objection -yes. No referral or info -no."

But pharmacists want opt outs too 

However, some commentators are suggesting that the Government may not be able to keep up this aggressive stance towards pro-life doctors and conscientious objection. According to the Irish Independent, "medical sources say the Government cannot afford to bring forward legislation which is not workable. It is likely that the law will have to include practical measures to recognise the potential for GPs to object to referral, even though it contravenes Medical Council guidelines."

The NAGP estimates that as many as eight in 10 GPs would choose not to opt-in to provide abortions under such a system. Meanwhile, Darragh O'Loughlin, secretary general of the Irish Pharmacy Union, confirmed he has written to Simon Harris to extend the right of conscientious objection to pharmacists who may not want to dispense abortion pills.

What about the UK?

In the UK, the issue of conscientious objection for medical professionals has been receiving attention. A bill put forward by Baroness O'Loan, which seeks to clarify the law to ensure that medical professionals are not discriminated against because of conscientious objection to practices that end human life, passed its second reading in the House of Lords in January. On the other hand, conscience rights are under threat from the current campaign to decriminalise abortion by repealing sections of the Offences Against the Person Act - such a move would invalidate the conscience provisions in the 1967 Abortion Act. 

The importance of conscience 

Dr Anthony McCarthy of SPUC commented: "As many rightly feared, the regime in Ireland, not content with implementing abortion on demand, is now proposing to ride roughshod over the conscience rights of the medical profession.

"Since the time of Hippocrates, the founding father of medical ethics, abortion has been recognised as incompatible with the genuine, ethical practice of medicine. A doctor who deliberately destroys life, instead of saving it, is not worthy of the name of doctor.

"Leo Varadkar and Simon Harris are now insisting that doctors who object to abortion must refer patients specifically to doctors who will abort their unborn babies. Yet such referrals make the first doctor complicit in the abortion, sending out the message that the doctor's objection and concern for the welfare of the patient and her baby is simply not strong enough to stop the doctor acting as a go-between.

"Someone who objects to torturing prisoners should not be expected to arrange for someone else to torture them instead. Someone who objects to FGMs should not be prepared to refer to another doctor who does FGMs. So why are Varadkar and Harris expecting those who object to abortion, as a gross violation of medical ethics and human rights, to signpost their patients to the very doctors who will carry out these horrible procedures?

"In these times, it is very important that GPs and other health care professionals be fully aware of the ethical issues at stake in co-operation with evil. I would urge readers to look at these two articles(http://www.cmq.org.uk/CMQ/2016/Nov/Complicity-&-coop-evil.html and http://www.cmfblog.org.uk/2017/05/24/getting-conscience-right-and-wrong/), especially in light of the contempt now being directed towards those who strive to act well in the role of doctor and healer."

News in brief:

Add your comment

Comments (1)

  • guido zara from belgium

    16 June 2018, 1:36pm

    well said spuc

    medical doctors worthy of that name should NOT refer to a child murderer who will do the gruesome wicked job himself !!

    of course many will do,also many of those socalled !!!! "catholic" doctors,and believe me I know what I am talking about

    I myself a layman lost my job in 1980 opposing the forced abortion upon an employee of the firm where I worked,the abortion eventually did not work but I lost my job,never worked again in my life and lost a total savings of around 300 thousand euros
    BUT I saved one life,the employee was given the choice, abortion and you get the job,otherwise no, she was an orphan and pressured by a family member on the board of the firm
    but she was grateful that I intervened,
    in short, if I were a doctor,NEVER would,could I work in a hospital where they do abortions,would leave immediately,how could I ,and never ever would I cooperate under any circumstances,or do you think that I am like the nazis
    I live outside the church whose response is pitiful, I am a christian who means what he says and does what he preaches,most catholics do not at all,sorry to say that
    guido
    all the best to spuc, I am 66 now, my parents are dead mr smeaton, one day I will leave my financial means to spuc, but now I cannot , must survive
    I did one very christian thing in 1980 and I am proud of it,and God approved of it, not the world sad to say
    abortion is BLOODY MURDER !!!!!!!! and satanically wicked !!!!!!

    Reply
    Your comment has been submitted and is currently awaiting approval

Share this article




  Donate to save lives