News, 2 January 2003
A scheme to provide the abortifacient morning-after pill free of charge
to women over 16 in Ayrshire and Arran, Scotland, is to be
re-introduced after health officials claimed that a pilot scheme had
proved successful. Women over the age of 16 can already obtain the
morning-after pill from pharmacists without a prescription throughout
the UK at a cost of £19.99, but a number of local health authorities
are operating schemes to provide the drug free of charge on the basis
that the cost may deter some women. During the trial scheme in Ayrshire
and Arran, which ran between November 2001 and May 2002, pharmacists
recorded 902 requests for the drug, 35 of which were turned down. Under
the new scheme, women who request the morning-after pill from a
pharmacist will be required to complete a consent form which could then
be passed to her GP. [
The Irvine Herald, 31 December]
The supreme court of Texas has ruled that the state is not
constitutionally obliged to fund abortions for poor women. The justices
voted by 8-0, with one abstention, to overturn a lower court ruling and
uphold a state law which prohibits the use of state Medicaid funding on
abortions except in cases of rape, incest or threat to the mother's
life. The court also affirmed that the state had a legitimate interest
in promoting childbirth over abortion. Pro-abortionists had argued that
abortion was often a 'medically necessary' procedure, and that the
state law was discriminatory because poor men were never denied
medically necessary procedures. However, pro-lifers observed that the
term 'medically necessary abortion' was now interpreted in such a way
that it meant 'abortion on demand'. [AP and
Pro-Life Infonet, 31 December]
A Catholic bishop in Uganda has heavily criticised those who are
agitating for the legalisation of abortion in his country. During a
speech at a graduation ceremony, Bishop Cyprian Lwanga of
Kasana-Luweero affirmed that abortion was murder and that no-one should
legalise what God had declared illegal. The bishop said that abortion
should not be tolerated anywhere because life was the greatest gift to
mankind. [
AllAfrica.com, 31 December; via Northern Light]
The regional co-ordinator for sexual health in Manchester, England, has
said that medical services are close to breaking point due to increased
demand for the morning-after pill and incidences of sexually
transmitted infections (STIs). There were 233% more cases of syphilis
in Greater Manchester last year, while cases of gonorrhoea and
chlamydia increased by 81% and 113% respectively. Alayne Robin urged
party-goers to be prepared and carry condoms, but did not allude to any
possible connection between higher use of the morning-after pill and
higher incidence of STIs. A spokesman for SPUC commented: "The policy
of easy access to the morning-after pill is simply not working. Not
only is it failing to reduce registered conception or abortion rates,
but it may also be linked to spiralling rates of STIs. The greatest
victims of this policy, however, are the countless tiny human persons
who are being killed by the morning-after pill." [
ManchesterOnline, 31 December; SPUC, 2 January]
The Catholic Church in the US is co-sponsoring an advertising campaign
to highlight the fact that abortion represents a failure by society to
meet women's needs. The Women Deserve Better campaign is being
sponsored by the pro-life secretariat of the US conference of Catholic
bishops and the Knights of Columbus to mark the 30th anniversary later
this month of Roe v Wade - the US supreme court decision that declared
a constitutional right to abortion. Advertisements will appear
throughout Washington DC bearing the message: "Abortion is a reflection
that we have not met the needs of women. Women deserve better than
abortion." [
PR Newswire, 30 December 2002; via Northern Light]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2010