News, 10 January 2003
The Vatican has prepared a set of guidelines on how Catholic
politicians should respond to "morally unjust and imperfect laws" in
areas such as abortion, artificial insemination, cloning and
euthanasia. The document, which will be published soon, has been put
together by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Reports
suggest that the document will resolve a debate on how one section of
Pope John Paul II's 1995 encyclical
Evangelium Vitae should be interpreted. [
Zenit, 9 January; Bloomberg, 10 January]
The UK's Voluntary Euthanasia Society (VES) has asked the Director of
Public Prosecutions (DPP) to "clarify" the law on assisted suicide
following the decision of the House of Lords [England's highest court]
in the case of Dianne Pretty. The court ruled that the DPP had acted
properly when he refused to agree not to prosecute Mrs Pretty's husband
if he helped his wife to die. The VES cited an article written by
Richard Tur, an academic at Oxford University, in which he argues that
the law lords made it clear that the DPP was entitled to form and
publish a policy document setting out the criteria he would use in
exercising his discretion as to which cases of assisted suicide should
be prosecuted. [
LawZONE, 10 January]
The Ugandan ambassador to Denmark has called for a debate on the
legalisation of abortion in his country. During discussions with Danish
and Ugandan politicians and the head of the Family Planning Association
of Uganda [which is an affiliate of IPPF, the world's largest abortion
promoter], Ambassador Omar Migadde Lubulwa claimed that the restrictive
law on abortion meant that young girls were dying every day due to
illegal abortions. [
AllAfrica.com, 9 January; via Northern Light]
Almost every country on the African continent has a restrictive law on
abortion, but international pro-abortionists are campaigning tirelessly
to change this.
Australian customs officers have confiscated a so-called death
machine from Dr Philip Nitschke as he prepared to take the device with
him to the US. Dr Nitschke, a prominent pro-euthanasia campaigner, had
planned to present the device to a pro-euthanasia conference in San
Diego next week. A spokesman for the customs service confirmed that
items had been seized from a passenger at Sydney airport because they
contravened legislation preventing the export of goods designed to
assist suicide. [Reuters, via FT, 10 January]
The minister in charge of China's State Family Planning Commission
has insisted that "family-planning work must be a top priority" in
order to sustain economic development. Zhang Weiqing said that low
population growth should be maintained, and that the social security
system should be more focused on the needs of small families. [Xinhua,
9 January] The minister's comments suggest that China is entrenching,
rather than liberalising, its one-child family population control
strategy which entails coerced abortion and widespread use of the
abortifacient intra-uterine device.
This week marked the tenth anniversary of the passing of restrictive
abortion legislation in the lower house of Poland's national
legislature [the law was passed in the upper house on 30 January and
came into effect on 16 March]. Prior to the passing of the law, a
concerted campaign by pro-life groups and the Catholic Church resulted
in a steady decline in the number of abortions in Poland from 105,333
in 1988 to 11,640 in 1992, when abortion was still legal on demand. The
restrictive abortion law, which prohibited abortion in most cases but
continued to allow it in cases of rape, incest, foetal handicap or
threat to the mother's life, led to a further decline in the abortion
figures so that in 2000 there were only 138 recorded abortions.
However, calls by Polish pro-abortionists this week for a
liberalisation of the law appear to have the support of the government.
Izabela Jaruga-Nowacka, the minister with responsibility for gender
equality, said that the abortion law was "shameful" and had had "only
negative consequences". [
AFP via FMF, 9 January; also see
A Way of Life (SPUC, 2002), section 6.1]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2010