The Italian cardinal who offered sanctuary to the family of Siamese
twins Jodie and Mary in order to save Mary from being killed in an
operation to separate the pair has described as "unacceptable" the
fact that the parents were prevented from appealing to the House of
Lords due to lack of money. Cardinal Ersilio Tonini, archbishop
emeritus of Ravenna, noting that the Maltese government had recognised
that the costs of a further appeal would be excessive, concluded: "Is
it possible that in a civilised country like Great Britain those who
have money can appeal and the rest not? In such a critical matter, do
we realise that the condition of poverty is what decided everything?
This is unacceptable." Meanwhile Jodie, the twin who survived the
operation, was said to be making a "dramatic recovery" and is now
breathing and feeding normally. [Zenit news agency, 8 November; Metro,
10 November]
Bertie Ahern, the Irish taoiseach [prime minister], has insisted that
no promises were made to four independent TDs [members of parliament]
that a referendum on the issue of abortion would definitely be held
next spring, contrary to reports in Irish newspapers. Mr Ahern
confirmed that no decision would be made before the all-party
committee on the constitution had presented its report and a cabinet
sub-committee had considered its findings. He also denied that any
decision had been made on the wording of any referendum question, or
whether a question on abortion would be put to the people on its own
or with a question on another issue. [The Irish Times, 9 November]
Pro-abortion pressure groups in the United States have claimed limited
successes in this week's elections to congress. The National Abortion
and Reproductive Rights Action League spent up to eight million
dollars on its campaign in 15 states, while Gloria Feldt, president of
the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, claimed to have spent 12 million
dollars nationally. Ms Feldt claimed that pro-abortionists had gained
three additional votes in the House of Representatives and at least
two in the Senate, but regretted that still "almost all key committee
chairs likely will be antichoice". [A.P. via New Jersey online, 9
November]
As Canada prepares for a general election later this month, the
Liberal party of prime minister Jean Chrétien has officially confirmed
its support for abortion. The announcement came in a response to a
questionnaire submitted by the Campaign Life Coalition. Terry Mercer,
the Liberal party's executive director, signed a statement which
confirmed the party's support for "a woman's right to choose" abortion
and added that "a Liberal government will not introduce amendments to
the criminal code with respect to abortion". The Liberal party had not
previously held an official pro-abortion stance. [LifeSite Daily News,
9 November; also see news digest for 23 October]
Switzerland's federal social security department announced on
Wednesday that private health insurers will have to cover the RU-486
abortion drug from next month. RU-486 was authorised for use in
Switzerland in October 1999, since when 2,300 women have used it.
There is no Swiss state-run health service and so all citizens must
take out private health insurance. [A.P. via Reinsurance News Network,
8 November]
A new law which would create so-called buffer or bubble zones around
abortion clinics in the American state of Massachusetts, thus
restricting the activities of pro-life demonstrators and counsellors,
is due to come into effect tomorrow. Police have been painting
boundary lines around abortion facilities, but pro-life campaigners
have asked a federal judge to grant an emergency order preventing
enforcement of the new law on the basis that it unfairly discriminates
against pro-lifers. Dwight G Duncan, an attorney representing the
campaigners, pointed out that the law exempted abortion clinic staff
who remained free to cajole prospective customers to come inside. [The
Boston Globe, 9 November]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2000