News, 18 May 2000
As the publication of the Donaldson committee report on human cloning
is awaited in the UK, a similar situation exists in the United States.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) have been pondering a set of
rules to govern cloning research for more than a year and their
recommendations are now expected to be put before the American
Department of Health and Human Services in June. However, some
observers believe that this could be delayed until after the
presidential election given the controversial nature of the subject.
James Thompson, a developmental biologist, can at present accept only
private money for his stem-cell research involving human embryos.
Complaining about the present lack of legal regulation, he wrote, "This
omission specifically allows private-sector scientists to either create
human embryos specifically for research or buy them in the regulatory
netherworld of infertility clinics. If you want to buy and sell
embryos, you can do that." [Star Tribune Online, 17 May]
The decision on whom American presidential candidate George W. Bush
will appoint as his running mate is looming. One front-runner is Tom
Ridge, Governor of Pennsylvania. He is known as a Catholic
pro-abortionist and is presently feuding with his bishop, a fact
commentators have warned might drive away Catholic voters. [Weekly
Standard, 15 May; from Pro-Life Infonet]
76 percent of Nebraskans favour legal restrictions on abortion, and 57
percent think that partial-birth abortions should be banned. The
opinion poll, which was conducted during the first week of this month,
comes after the state defended its partial-birth abortion ban before
the US Supreme Court. A recent national poll indicated that 66 percent
of all Americans favour a ban on partial-birth abortions. [Omaha World
Herald, 16 May; from Pro-Life Infonet]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2010