3 Whitacre Mews, Stannary Street
London, SE11 4AB, United Kingdom
Telephone: (020) 7091 7091
Fax: (020) 7820 3131
Email: information@spuc.org.uk
Euthanasia
Related blog posts
From despair to hope: The euthanasia petitioner who changed her mind 11 July 2008
Resisting euthanasia at the bedside 9 July 2008
SPUC plans to intervene in assisted suicide case 12 June 2008
Political furore in Tyneside over killing children "joke" 5 April 2008
Euthanasia, the white rose and students 22 Feb 2008
Fr John Fleming on the Mental Capacity Act 19 Feb 2008
suspended sentence for assisting suicide 8 Feb 2008
Do we live in a civilised country? Draw your own conclusions. 29 Jan 2008
report on transplants rings alarm bells 17 Jan 2008
Mental Capacity Act
Parliament passed the Mental Capacity Act on 5th April 2005. The Act can be read on the Office of Public Sector Information website here. Deliberate killing by dehydration has become more prevalent since the 1993 Bland judgment. The Bland judgement opened the door for doctors to dehydrate and starve to death certain mentally incapacitated patients. What the Mental Capacity Act does, through advance decisions, lasting powers of attorney and the re-definition of "best interests" and "medical treatment", is to extend the principles of the Bland decision to all mentally incapacitated patients. The passage of the Bill will have profound repercussions - it will mean that doctors will be forced to choose between killing some of their patients and leaving the profession. It will destroy what is left of medical ethics in this country.
In a letter to the Catholic Herald, a group of Catholic medical and legal experts wrote:
"The Pope in a recent address has made it clear that even in the case of PVS patients 'the administration of water and food, even when provided by artificial means, always represents a natural means of preserving life, not a medical act. Its use, furthermore, should be considered, in principle, ordinary and proportionate, and as such morally obligatory, insofar as and until it is seen to have attained its proper finality, which in the present case consists in providing nourishment to the patient and alleviation of his suffering'. This Bill would permit and indeed legally protect routine abuse and termination of the life of the vulnerable and would create an inconsistent body of law with conflicting obligations for health professionals. It compromises the principle that all people have an intrinsic dignity irrespective of their mental impairment or physical condition, one of the cornerstones of Christian civilization, enshrined not only in the ancient common law of England, but also in the Hippocratic tradition of medicine and in international law properly understood."
Doctors who refuse on clinical or other ethical grounds to implement an advance refusal of treatment face litigation and possibly criminal conviction. Even in situations where there is no obligation to provide therapeutic measures (for example, when they are ineffective) there remains a duty of care towards the patient. It would be unreasonable, and immoral, to force healthcare professionals to relinquish this responsibility because of their conscientious objection to implementing clinically inappropriate or unethical advance refusals.
Mental Capacity Act Explained
Patients First Network (PFN)
Patients First Network (PFN) helps you to let doctors, nurses and other healthcare workers know how you expect to be treated in hospital if you are mentally incapacitated. PFN fights against euthanasia. More
