The question of in vitro fertilisation
The studies in this publication were submitted by the Society for the
Protection of Unborn Children as evidence to the government inquiry
into human fertilisation and embryology (sometimes referred to as the
Warnock committee). They set out the objections to
in vitro fertilisation, on medical, humanitarian and social grounds
Evidence to the government inquiry into human fertilisation and
embryology from the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children
- Professor Jérôme Lejeune, MD, PhD
- Professor Paul Ramsey
- Gerard Wright, QC
© 1984, the SPUC Educational Research Trust
Contents
- Test tube babies are babies, Professor Jérôme Lejeune, Professor of Fundamental Genetics, University René Descartes, Paris
- The issues facing mankind, Paul Ramsey, Harrington Spear Paine Professor of Religion, Princeton University, New Jersey, USA
- Legal status of the IVF embryo, Gerard Wright QC, counsel's opinion
- Man's intrusion on nature, the national council of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children
- Government circular giving guidelines to all organisations wishing to submit evidence to the Warnock Committee
- Medical Research Council guidelines for researchers involved in the use of IVF with human gametes
HTML editor's note: The appendices, which provide the context
of the SPUC submission, are included on this page of the HTML version
of this publication. Please note that besides its opposition to in
vitro fertilisation in principle, SPUC does not necessarily endorse the
assumptions, definitions, language and reasoning in these documents.
Background documents
1 November 1982
Dear ...............,
GOVERNMENT INQUIRY INTO HUMAN FERTILIZATION AND EMBRYOLOGY
As
you know, the Government has established a Committee of Inquiry into
Human Fertilization and Embryology, under the chairmanship of Mrs Mary
Warnock. The Inquiry's terms of reference are:
"to consider recent and potential developments in medicine
and science related to human fertilization and embryology; to consider
what policies and safeguards should be applied, including consideration
of the social, ethical and legal implications of their developments and
to make recommendations."
At its first meeting on 14 October the Inquiry decided
that it should seek the views of a wide range of interested bodies on
all aspects of its work. I am therefore writing to you to invite you to
submit written evidence to the Inquiry. The Inquiry will be interested
in views on any part of its work, but there are a number of subjects on
which evidence, whether of a factual nature describing current
activities and problems or concerned with implications of these
activities, would be especially welcome. These are:
a. therapeutic, that is, concerned with the
therapeutic aspects of recent developments for the treatment of
infertility and the prevention of inherited disease.
b. scientific and research, the potential use of new
techniques for the advancement of knowledge of human physiology and
pathology. In this context the Inquiry recognises there may be no clear
distinction between the terms "medical" and "scientific", while the
former may imply a direct therapeutic purpose, the latter may include
an advance in knowledge whose end product is not immediately
therapeutic, although it may in combination with other factors become
so.
c. legal, this area would include questions (if legal
liability, the rights of" the individual (both the parents and child
and, in the case of artificial insemination, the donor), legitimacy,
incest. inheritance and the rights of surrogate mothers.
d. social, including the implications for society
example the ability to choose the sex of a child in advance. While the
Inquiry finds it difficult to determine specifically social issues, it
feels strongly that developments in an area as fundamental as human
reproduction are bound to have effects on the way people regard
children, parenthood and the family in general, and are anxious to have
the views of those with an interest in how attitudes are likely to
change.
e. moral and ethical, any consideration of the above
involves making moral and ethical judgements, for example, in the
acceptability of certain techniques, and the Inquiry hopes that those
submitting evidence will highlight those issues which they believe to
pose the greatest moral or ethical questions.
The Inquiry is aware that many organisations may not
have a detailed knowledge of the range of techniques which have given
rise to concern. The enclosed note has been written to assist those
preparing evidence by giving examples of the types of issue that the
Inquiry will be considering. It must be stressed that the note is only
illustrative of the issues, some of which are highly controversial. The
note in no sense reflects the thinking of the Inquiry or implies that
any conclusions have been reached. Indeed the Inquiry is anxious to
promote a wide-ranging debate on all these issues. However, I think I
should point out that in considering the scope of their work, the
Inquiry decided that its terms of reference include sex selection and
artificial insemination, but not abortion and contraception. The
Inquiry would not wish to receive evidence on the latter subjects.
A number of bodies have already asked whether they could give oral
evidence as well as make submissions in writing. The Inquiry may well
wish to explore certain points in detail in this way, but do not wish
to make any final decisions on this until they have had an opportunity
to assess written evidence. It is however likely that the taking of
oral evidence will be the exception rather than the rule and bodies
preparing evidence should view their written submission as their sole
opportunity to state their position.
The Inquiry is anxious to make progress with its task but
appreciates that it takes time to prepare evidence. It has therefore
decided to allow a period of three months for the submission of
evidence. Evidence should be sent to the Secretary to the Inquiry at
the following address, to arrive not later than 1st March 1983:
The Secretary, Inquiry into Human Fertilization and Embryology,
Room B1202, Department of Health and Social Security, Alexander Fleming
House, Elephant and Castle, LONDON SE1 6BY
Any queries, either about the Inquiry and its scope, or the submission evidence, should also be made to the Secretariat.
Yours sincerely,
Mrs, J.C. Croft
Secretary to the Inquiry into Human Fertilization
Medical and Scientific Developments Relevant to Human Fertilization
Introduction
1. This paper describes the techniques that have been used or that
may be developed in the near future to modify the earliest stages of
human fertilization and embryology . The circumstances in which these
might be used are mentioned but the paper does not consider their
legal, ethical or social implications.
Background
2. About one couple in ten are infertile. Most of the techniques
described in this paper have been developed to overcome particular
types of infertility in either husband or wife. Some of the later
paragraphs describe procedures that will not lead directly to the birth
of a child, but would increase knowledge and understanding of the
physiology and pathology of hum an reproduction.
In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer (IVF)
3. In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer became a human
reality when the first "test tube baby" was delivered by Mr Patrick
Steptoe at Oldham General Hospital in June 1978. This birth was the
culmination of more than a decade of research by Mr Steptoe and Dr
Robert Edwards of Cambridge. Their programme at Oldham resulted in two
further IVF births.
The IVF Technique
4. In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer is used primarily to
overcome female infertility due to the absence or gross disease of the
Fallopian Tubes, down which the egg. has to pass to reach the uterus. .
The concept of IVF is simple; a ripe human egg is extracted from the
ovary shortly before it would have been released by nature, Next, the
egg is mixed with the semen of the husband or partner, so that
fertilization can occur. The fertilized egg is then transferred back to
the mother's uterus, once it has started to divide. In practice the
technique for recovery of the eggs for fertilization, their culture
outside the mother's body, and the retransfer of the developing embryo
to the uterus, have to be carried out under very carefully controlled
conditions.
5. An alternative method that does not involve fertilization
outside the mother's body has also been used. In this the egg and semen
are immediately transferred back so that fertilization takes place in
the uterus. By either method once a fertilized egg has implanted in its
mother's uterus subsequent development should proceed in the same way
as a normally conceived pregnancy.
IVF in the UK
6. In 1980 Mr Steptoe and Dr Edwards opened a private clinic at
Bourn Hall, Cambridge, where IVF is now available to UK residents and
to couples from overseas. It was reported recently that there have been
more than 140 pregnancies conceived at Bourn Hall, representing a 20-25
per cent success rate among women to whom embryos have been
transferred. The only other successful pregnancies have been at the
Royal Free Hospital, where the first pair of "test tube twins" born in
the UK were delivered. Other IVF programmes at the Hammersmith
Hospital, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester and elsewhere have yet to
achieve a viable pregnancy.
IVF in other Countries
7. In Australia there is a successful IVF programme in Melbourne,
and there have also been IVF births in France, USA, Sweden and Denmark.
The technique is now being used in many more centres worldwide.
Developments of IVF
8. "Surrogate Mothers, Womb Leasing and Egg Donation"
In veterinary practice it is now possible for an embryo, conceived
in vitro, to be transferred to the uterus of a cow, pig or sheep that
is not its natural mother. There are reports that in the USA and
Australia similar methods have been used to transfer IVF embryos to
women who are not genetically related. The term "surrogate mother" has
been used to describe this situation, which has also been described as
"egg donation". In the UK there are as yet no reports of a successful
pregnancy in which a woman has borne a child of which she was not the
genetic mother.
9. It has been suggested that human egg. donation might be used:
a. Where a woman has or may be the carrier of an hereditary
disease. She might receive a donated egg, which after fertilization by
her husband's sperm in vitro would then be transferred to her uterus.
In this way the woman would carry her husband's child to term and thus
be the child's physiological mother, without the risk that she might
pass on her disease to the child.
b. When a woman cannot herself bear a child. She could donate an
egg which would be fertilized by her husband's sperm in vitro and then
transferred to the uterus of another woman. The surrogate mother would
then carry the pregnancy but return the child to its genetic parents
after delivery. This sequence of events has been called "womb leasing"
in some publications, if the mother is to be paid to carry the
pregnancy.
Womb Leasing for Artificial Insemination by Donor (AID)
10. There is, however, a clear distinction between surrogate
motherhood, as described above, and recent UK press reports of another
type of "womb leasing" resulting from AID (see para 20). In this case a
married couple who could not have children made an agreement with
another woman that she would bear a child fathered by the husband.
Following the birth, the mother was to give the baby to the couple. The
child was conceived by AID, but when the baby was born the mother
decided to keep the child herself. Although the reports referred to
this arrangement as "womb leasing" the pregnancy was, in effect, no
different from other AID pregnancies.
Cloning
11. In certain amphibian species such as frogs, and more recently
in some mammals, for example sheep, it has become possible as an
experimental procedure to divide a fertilized embryo when it was at a
very early stage of development and contains two or four cells. The
result is that each of these cells develops into a separate individual
(clone) but with identical characteristics and genetic constitution to
its siblings derived from the same embryo. Human identical twins are
the result of natural cloning when a two-cell human embryo separates to
become two separate embryos.
12. The possibility exists that cloning could be used to
investigate the chromosomal normality of human embryos conceived by a
couple who have a high chance of procreating an abnormal child. For
example, a young mother who has already given birth to an infant with
Down's Syndrome and analysis of her chromosomes shows that she has a
high chance of a similarly affected child in a subsequent pregnancy,
might choose to have her next embryo conceived in vitro. The embryo
would then be allowed to develop to the two or four cell stage where it
would be cloned. One of the clones would be allowed to continue
development while the remaining clones would be deep frozen (see para
13). Development of the unfrozen clone would continue for some further
divisions until it was possible to determine by cytogenetic techniques
whether the embryo had the normal chromosomal complement or the extra
chromosome that is diagnostic of Down's Syndrome. If the embryo had a
chromosome abnormality the frozen clones would not be transferred to
the mother. If on the other hand the embryo had a normal chromosomal
make-up, one or more of the clones could be unfrozen and transferred to
the mother's uterus.
There are no reports of a successful human pregnancy following
cloning of the embryo. A postulated use for human cloning. would be to
produce identical twins deliberately.
Freezing of Human Embryos
13. Human semen can be successfully frozen for many months or
years. The same techniques could be applied to early human embryos
which might be deep frozen for subsequent use, as is now possible in
veterinary practice. Before discussing the freezing of embryos further
the induction of super-ovulation should be mentioned, although this
technique is often used entirely separately from IVF.
Induction of Super-Ovulation
14. Normally one egg is released during. each human menstrual
cycle. Some women do not release an egg regularly and for them certain
drugs, such as chorionic gonadotrophin may be used to stimulate
ovulation, as this can cause the release of several eggs in a single
cycle (super-ovulation). As the recovery of an egg for IVF involves a
surgical operation and an anaesthetic, drugs that cause super-ovulation
can be used so that more than one egg can be recovered from a single
operation. However these drugs may also disorganise the normal hormonal
cycle so that after IVF the transfer of the embryo to the mother's
uterus is less likely to succeed.
15. To avoid multiple operations to collect a single egg each time,
super-ovulation can be induced by drugs and the eggs collected and
fertilized. The resulting. embryos could then be deep frozen until the
optimum time for transfer back to the mother's uterus in a subsequent
cycle.
16. Other suggested reasons for freezing embryos are:
a. To enable women to have an IVF pregnancy months or years after
they or their partners have been sterilised, or even after their
husband's death. This would be similar to the posthumous use of frozen
semen for Artificial Insemination by Husband (AIH).
b. The use of cloning and freezing techniques to ensure that an
embryo with a chromosomal abnormality is not transferred to the mother
was discussed in paragraph 12.
c. Storage of embryos for experimental purposes is described in paragraph 27.
17. Researchers in various parts of the world are attempting to
store human embryos by deep freezing. techniques. There is a recent
Australian report that a human embryo has been successfully unfrozen
and continued its in vitro development, but no report that an unfrozen
embryo has been transferred back to its mother and resulted in a
successful pregnancy.
Artificial Insemination
18. Historically, artificial insemination was the first technique
applied to modify human reproduction almost 100 years ago . [here are
two types of artificial insemination - Artificial Insemination by
Husband (AIH) and Artificial Insemination by Donor (AID). Both are now
widely used.
AIH
19. This technique is used for some couples who cannot otherwise
conceive and, if for example, it is felt that the chances of pregnancy
would be increased by concentrating the husband's semen or by inserting
it directly into the uterus. Other reasons for AIH occur:
i. When the husband cannot ejaculate but instead passes his semen into the bladder (retrograde ejaculation).
ii. For some couples where the husband is severely physically
handicapped and AIH offers the only possibility for him to father a
child.
iii . If a man is to undergo surgery or radiotherapy that may
result in sterility, his semen may be stored by deep freezing and used
at a late date for AIH . More recently semen has been similarly stored
by some men before they undergo vasectomy as a means of permanent
contraception.
iv. Less commonly, AIH may be used to overcome a particular type
of female infertility where antibodies which kill the sperm are found
in the cervical mucus. In such cases AIH may be successful when the
semen is injected into the uterus.
AID
20. Artificial Insemination by Donor is used when investigations
have shown the husband to be infertile or to have significantly reduced
fertility. For AID, semen is donated by another man. AID has also been
used when a fertile husband stiffens from, or may be the carrier of, a
serious hereditary condition for example, Huntington's Chorea; and the
couple decide that they will not risk passing on the husband's
condition to the next generation.
21. Both AIH and AID may be carried out using fresh or frozen
semen. . There have been many successful pregnancies using frozen semen
, although the proportion of successful inseminations is not as high as
if is with fresh semen. For AIH and AID the semen may either be placed
in the upper portion of the vagina next to the cervix or injected into
the uterus through a fine catheter.
The Use of AID in the UK
22. It is known that in 1979 more than 1800 women began treatment
in the UK, and in the same year there were over 800 pregnancies from
AID.
Choosing the Sex of Human Offspring
23. There are at present two techniques available that can identify
the foetal sex as early as 16-18 weeks gestation, namely ultrasound, or
amniocentesis followed by chromosomal analysis. Either method is now
used to identify the foetal gender when there is a risk of a sex linked
hereditary disease, but both techniques can only be used at a
relatively late stage of pregnancy. If a foetus of the affected gender
is identified, a late abortion may be carried out under section 1.1.B
of the Abortion Act.
24. It has been suggested that IVF, cloning and freezing techniques
could be used to determine the sex of an embryo prior to its transfer
to the mother's uterus, thereby avoiding the situation where a late
abortion might otherwise be performed on account of an inherited sex
linked disorder such as haemophilia. It has also been suggested the
techniques might be used more widely by couples who particularly wanted
a child of a given sex.
25. In future, the development of a technique to separate male and
female bearing. sperm would also allow couples to choose the sex of
their offspring using. AIH after the sperm had been separated.
Techniques to separate male and female bearing sperm do not exist at
present.
Trans-species Fertilization
26. It has been found that trans-species fertilization studies
using human sperm and hamster eggs can differentiate between cases of
unexplained male human infertility, usually where the man has a very
low sperm count. Studies show that men whose sperm will not fertilize a
specially treated hamster egg. have little prospect of fertility,
whereas those whose sperm will do so, may father a pregnancy if they
try for long enough. The hamster-human hybrid will, however, not
develop beyond the two cell stage. It has been suggested that this test
may become a routine and important test in the investigation of male
subfertility.
Experimental use of Human Embryos
27. Tests for teratogenicity in animals cannot be relied on as an
absolute guide to drug safety in human pregnancy. Once a drug or other
substance has passed the full range of animal studies, a more
scientific way to test for human teratogenicity might be to carry out
tests on human embryos cultured in vitro. Other experiments using human
IVF embryos could be used to investigate the causes of major
abnormalities such as spina bifida, cleft palate and hare lip. The
protagonists of the use of human embryos for experimental purposes
argue that the best species for human experimentation is man, and claim
that many uncertainties of human embryology and genetics could be
resolved by experiments of this kind.
Ongoing Development of the Human Embryo and Foetus In Vitro (Ectogenesis)
28. In the current state of knowledge it is not possible to
maintain development of a human (or other primate) embryo in vitro
beyond a comparatively early stage but development of current
techniques is likely to result in embryos being maintained for
progressively longer periods so that embryonic and foetal development
can be studied. Once these are available it may be suggested that
studies should be specifically carried out using human embryos to
document in detail the normal and abnormal stages of human embryonic
and foetal development. In the foreseeable future it is improbable that
a human embryo could be maintained indefinitely by purely in vitro
methods (ectogenesis). However, it may become possible to maintain such
embryos for considerably longer periods than can now be achieved.
Genetic Manipulation of Human Embryos
29. Within the next 10-20 years advances in molecular biology may
make it possible for defective genes in a very early human embryo to be
identified and selectively removed or replaced by normal genes. Such
manipulations are not possible in the present stage of knowledge but
there is already speculation that techniques of this kind might be used
by a couple who are at risk of pro-creating a child with an inherited
condition due to a single gene, for example cystic fibrosis. If it
became possible to identify and replace the cystic fibrosis gene in a
IVF embryo, the mother could be assured that the embryo being
transferred to her uterus would not suffer from this abnormality. There
are a number of other inherited conditions such as Thalassaemia and
Tay-Sachs disease, which are also due to single genes, that might be
amenable to this type of genetic manipulation. It has been suggested
that in the distant future whole chromosomes might be replaced by
similar methods.
The use of Cloned IVF Tissues and Organs for Transplantation
30. It has been suggested that in the long term it may become
possible to use IVF and cloning techniques to produce embryonic and
foetal organs of an exact tissue type for transplantation purposes.
Such organs could be matched to correspond in every detail with the
immunological characteristics of the intended recipient of the
transplant . Problems of tissue rejection would thereby be overcome,
and it has been suggested these techniques could overcome the shortage
of organs that are available for transplantation.
Conclusion
31. This note is not intended as a comprehensive description of all
the techniques that might in future be rinsed to modify human
fertilization and embryology. The purpose of the paper has been to
outline existing techniques and future developments that will be
discussed by the Inquiry into Human Fertilization and Embryology..
Research related to Human Fertilization and Embryology
This statement was also published in the
British Medical Journal 1982 Vol 285 p 1480
Introduction
The purpose of this statement is to set out the guidelines which
the Medical Research Council believe should guide those whose research
involves the use of in vitro fertilization with human gametes. The
council's intention is that the guidance should be followed by workers
supported by the council, but the principles are believed to be
generally valid for all such research.
Background
In 1978 the council set up an advisory group to review policy on
research related to in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in
humans. The group decided to concern itself only with the ethics of
such work and did not examine specific scientific aspects. The group
advised the council that scientifically sound research involving in
vitro fertilization - where there was no intent to transfer the embryo
to the uterus - should be allowed to proceed if its aim were clearly
defined and acceptable; and concluded that, in the context of female
infertility due to tubal occlusion, in vitro fertilization with
subsequent embryo transfer should be regarded as a therapeutic
procedure covered by the normal ethics of the doctor/patient
relationship. The council endorsed these views.
In May 1982 the advisory group way reconvened with an expanded membership* and terms of reference as follows:
"to consider recent and potential developments in research related
to human fertilization and embryology, and to advise the council on
these and on the ethical grounds they should take into account in
considering research proposals in these areas.
The group's further conclusions have been accepted by the council as an appropriate basis for MRC policy.
Guidelines for research related to human fertilization and embryology
i. Scientifically sound research involving. experiments on the
processes and products of in vitro fertilization between human gametes
is ethically acceptable and should be allowed to proceed on condition
both that there is no intent to transfer to the uterus any embryo
resulting from or used in such experiments and also that the aim of the
research is clearly defined and directly relevant to clinical problems
such as contraception or the differential diagnosis and treatment of
infertility and inherited diseases.
ii. Informed consent to research involving human ova or sperm
should be obtained in every case from the donor(s); sperm from sperm
banks should not be used unless collected and preserved specifically
for a research purpose. Approval for each experiment should be obtained
from the appropriate scientific and local ethical committees.
iii. When human ova have been obtained and fertilized in vitro for
a therapeutic purpose and are no longer required for that purpose it
would be ethical to use them for soundly based research provided that
the informed consent of both donors was obtained.
iv. Human ova fertilized with human sperm should not be cultured in
vitro beyond the implantation stage; and should not be stored for
unspecified research use.
v. Although it is not always possible to extrapolate results from
animal work to the human situation, studies of animal gametes and
embryos are useful to elucidate the potential risks of in vitro
fertilization and embryo transfer. Tests of animal embryos in
appropriate animal models are necessary before it can be assumed that
freezing and storage of the embryo does not cause harm to the
conceptus.
vi. Studies on interspecies fertilization are valuable in providing
information on the penetration capacity and chromosome complement of
sperm from subfertile males, and should be supported. The fertilized
ova should not be allowed to develop beyond the early cleavage stage.