History
Instigation
In Britain before 1967, the law gave substantial protection to unborn children. In the case of
R. v.
Bourne (1938) in which the defendant, the gynaecologist Aleck Bourne,
had performed an abortion on a girl who had been raped, the jury upheld
the judge's view that an abortion could lawfully be done to prevent the
mother from becoming "a physical or mental wreck." On this view of the
law, abortion was allowed on serious medical grounds, but abortion on
demand was certainly unlawful.
In 1966, the founder members of SPUC recognised that the Medical
Termination of Pregnancy Bill (which became the Abortion Act 1967) then
before Parliament would drastically change the law, leading to abortion
on demand. The society was formed to oppose the Bill. Aleck Bourne, the
gynaecologist who had instigated the landmark court case of 1938, had
become increasingly appalled that his case was being used to justify
the new legislation, and became a founder member of SPUC.
Opposition to the proposed liberalisation of the abortion law was at
that time supported by the British Medical Association and the Royal
College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, bodies which only became
dominated by a more permissive approach to abortion several years after
the new law was implemented. As a pressure group formed specifically to
lobby for the rights of the unborn child, SPUC was the first
organisation to be established anywhere in the world in what is known
as the pro-life movement.
Principle of action
SPUC was founded to uphold the principle of respect for human
life, in particular the life of the unborn child. The society's
constitution was, and remains, non-religious, endorsing the recognition
by the world community in the 1959 United Nations Declaration of the
Rights of the Child that the child "needs special safeguards and care,
including appropriate legal protection, before as well as after birth."
The society has a set of
aims.
Development
Formed as a pressure group, SPUC has continued to operate as such, the
main focus of its work being the parliamentary campaigns against
abortion and embryo experimentation, as well as opposing the
legalisation of euthanasia. In the passage of the Human Fertilisation
and Embryology Act 1990, parliament legalised destructive
experimentation on human embryos in the laboratory up to 14 days after
conception, and abortion up to birth in certain cases including
disability in the unborn child. However, the voting patterns of MPs and
the rejection of more easily available abortion clearly showed the
great increase in strength of the pro-life lobby in parliament since
1967. The legislative setbacks of 1990 also gave a new impetus to
SPUC's campaign, which enjoyed several political and legislative
successes in the subsequent Parliament. The society has many other
achievements.
The society's areas of activity have also expanded, with the
development of extensive contacts in many spheres, nationally and
internationally. SPUC has developed grass-roots support in Britain
through its branches and the activity of members promoting the pro-life
cause in political parties, trade unions, educational institutions and
religious groupings (principally the Christian churches and the Muslim
community).
Present status
A voluntary organisation
SPUC is a privately funded voluntary organisation. It is not a
registered charity, remaining free to pursue its legislative objectives
unimpeded by the constraints of charity law.
Funding
The society depends for its income (which is in the region of 1 million
pounds annually) on donations and fundraising by members and
supporters. Many of the organisations opposed to the rights of unborn
children are in receipt of funds from government departments and grants
from private foundations, such as the International Planned Parenthood
Federation, which is funded by governments and non-governmental
foundations worldwide and which receives millions of pounds every year.
Independence
SPUC enjoys a high degree of independence. As the society is not a body
of any church or political party, and has limited affiliations, it is
free to operate effectively across a wide denominational, political and
social spectrum.